Enhance your skills with the Court Reporter Exam. Prepare with practice questions and detailed explanations. Get ready to excel in your court reporting career.

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


In what scenario would the term "res ipsa loquitor" typically be applied?

  1. In cases of negligence

  2. In contractual disputes

  3. In criminal cases

  4. In property law

The correct answer is: In cases of negligence

The term "res ipsa loquitor" is a legal doctrine that is primarily applied in cases of negligence. This Latin phrase translates to "the thing speaks for itself," and it is used in situations where the circumstances of an accident imply that negligence has occurred, even without direct evidence of the defendant's actions. In a negligence case, this doctrine allows a plaintiff to establish a presumption of negligence that shifts the burden of proof to the defendant. For example, if a patient undergoes surgery and a surgical instrument is left inside their body, the circumstances surrounding such an event are typically so indicative of negligence that it can be reasonably inferred without needing specific evidence of what the medical staff did or did not do. In contrast, contractual disputes involve different legal principles focused on the terms of a contract and whether they were fulfilled or breached. Criminal cases are governed by standards of proof specifically related to criminal acts and intent, and the application of res ipsa loquitor does not align with property law, which deals with rights and obligations regarding ownership and use of property. Thus, the correct context for applying "res ipsa loquitor" is indeed in cases of negligence.